PeacefulSwannie wrote:
Benghazi Emails Directly Contradict White House Claims
The White House on Wednesday released 94 pages of emails between top
administration and intelligence officials who helped shape the talking
points about the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that the CIA would provide
to policymakers in both the legislative and executive branches.The documents, first reported by THE WEEKLY STANDARD in articles here and here,
directly contradict claims by White House press secretary Jay Carney
and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the revisions of those
talking points were driven by the intelligence community and show heavy
input from top Obama administration officials, particularly those at the
State Department.
The emails provide further detail about the rewriting of the talking
points during a 24-hour period from midday September 14 to midday
September 15. As THE WEEKLY STANDARD previously reported, a briefing
from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence shows that the
big changes came in three waves – internally at the CIA, after email
feedback from top administration officials, and during or after a
meeting of high-ranking intelligence and national security officials the
following morning.

Read more @ http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/newly-released-benghazi-emails-directly-contradict-white-house-claims_724603.html



Yep! They were finally caught wading knee deep in their lies Pen. To let MOKSHA know I did not miss his point, I would like to pose the question of what exactly has this administration been trying to pull?

And maybe ask a few more things, starting with why our armed forces have been reluctant to obey their CIC? Why has the Obama Administration pushed so hard for voter registration ON THE ABSENTEE BALLOT only? And what have they been using to continually get nothing but good press in America when no administration since JFK has received such kid glove treatment?

Methinks somebody worked overtime creating an image which is not correct. Why was one of the first things Obama did was to make certain that information regarding his past was sealed? I doubt that such an act is even legal for a candidate. If it is, it should not be. I wonder what would get found out if they were to thoroughly investigate the administration? With any luck at all, they will find grounds to do so eh?

Tim