icepick wrote:
PeacefulSwannie wrote:
icepick wrote:
Rand is surprising me. I do not agree with him on everything, but he does seem to be the only candidate who tries to address the needs of all the people. Too bad the press keeps trying to trash him. But if he keeps this up, nothing they do will matter.

No, that watered down version should never get on the books. It was time for this monster to die the day that it was passed.
It was only supposed to be temporary, and I think that when they discovered how lucrative it was they don't want to give it up.  Basically its the US version of the Stasi.   America has always stood for freedom and democracy, but now that has all changed....


No, it has not changed, but there are a lot of people working very hard to make it that way. An internal struggle in this nation that will inevitably lead to civil war if it's not stopped. And I would call that background group you mentioned an American Gestapo, not Stasi, because that would be closer to the truth. It's how we know that the true culprit here is Obama. Not Bush, who has been Obama's whipping boy so to speak, because the press has helped Obama to pass the blame for all of his criminal activities on to Bush, ever since Obama has been in office. The goal appears to be to bring enough Muslims across our southern border in order to establish a foothold. Unfortunately for him, the Supreme Court has ruled against the illegal INS practices, at least until the states suing Obama has had time to bring their lawsuit into the courts. It's more than obvious that the villain here is Obama, whose sympathies for the Muslims are now so far out in the open that they can no longer be ignored. Bush is a Presbyterian, whose main crime is having not exactly been the sharpest tool in the shed.

I know what most of the papers are trying to say. It's all lies. But much of the public rushes to believe Obama. Or they did, until he started all of this race baiting business. When people believe Obama's lies about this not being a big deal because the practices reach all the way back to Reagan, they increase Hillary's chances in 2016, which is precisely what we must stop. Yes, Bush did engage in some illegal surveillance, INSIDE OUR BORDERS. Obama expanded that to take in every nation on Earth. In my opinion it was so he could collect enough dirt on everybody to blackmail them. We need everybody to spot who the true criminals are, so that we can deal with this evil administration without having to resort to bloodshed.
Tim, I think Bush is just as guilty..... especially when you consider his family owns Booz Allen....  he saw a way of feathering the family nest.....   I know Obama expanded it, but the truth is if there wasn't a Patriot Act in the first place he would have had nothing to expand on.


"What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us."  ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson ~