Except ........... they keep thinking too much ................. but forget all about Quantum Mechanics not being what we erroneously call proven theory yet. We can't even refer to it as validated/verified theory at this point in time if one gets technical about things. And the issue will remain this way until we gain a solid enough understanding of gravity to actually control it. This cannot be the manipulation of gravitational forces that we are beginning to get a handle on either. It absolutely must be 100% natural gravitational control. Why? Remember what world Quantum was meant to explore. The atomic, and sub atomic realm. Think of this like what the atomic realm resembles, a solar system. If you moved a planet around, what would happen? Rigghhhtttt, all of the other celestial bodies would behave differently. You cannot move objects that big around without affecting the other objects in the immediate vicinity, due to the gravitational forces they exhibit on one another. Now compare your size to that of an atom. See the problem that Particle Physics is up against? If you try to observe any object you want to study, you will find it impossible to observe its natural behavior.

And this may well be a major conundrum of sorts for them, because it may well require an understanding of all things Quantum, in order to understand how gravity works in its natural state. If gravity even has what we traditionally think of as a state of course. Gravity might easily be a fictional entity ............. the end result of the effects that the known forces exert on one another. That could explain why this perceived force which has such an extremely powerful effect on everything, is in itself such a weak entity. Don't get me wrong here, because I firmly believe that we are capable of cracking it. But as long as we remain stuck having to apply philosophy in our studies on Quantum Mechanics, we're going to have these problems. Think of it like a math problem where we committed an error, and in trying to find the error, we keep repeating it. I'm sure we've all done that?

Here's what I'm trying to say. In their attempts to do away with free will, they keep forgetting the power of the human mind in their equations. We are all mini co-creators in a manner of speaking. Yes, they're finally beginning to get a clue about that. This means that there are many of these co-creators having an effect on what they're calling the physical world. Now you have a conflict at work. Make that many conflicts. If everything was pre-determined, then we would be nothing more than automatons, rendering things such as learning and creativity meaningless. Everything would already be etched in stone, and all we would have left for us to do, is sit back to watch it all happen. Yeesh, what a boring existence.

So while there is a point to what these people say, they cannot tell you what that point is. Hence, what the author referred to as the hand waving. This is why Einstein was able to imagine his spooky action at a distance, yet was never able to solve Unification. Something is missing from the equation, and Physicists have allowed themselves to get in a rut in their thinking. To their credit, the truly brilliant ones are we aware of this, and are working hard to think outside of that box. Problem is, they're still trying to find out where the outside of this particular box is. It will probably remain lost until ............. you guessed it ............. they solve the riddle of gravity. Once they do, then they will be able to spot their mistakes immediately, and who knows how far we might advance .............. practically overnight.

My problem is, that I'm not so certain we are ready for such a forward surge. Are you? In other words, maybe somebody placed this particular hurdle here for a reason?